TO VAX OR NOT TO VAX; that is the question.
- Lawson
- Sep 14, 2021
- 5 min read
I'm all about people knowing the truth and spreading the truth; and that is the unvarnished truth, not padded down to make someone else more comfortable. If you received the vaccine and you feel safer now, then good for you. I'm 100% all for people feeling safe in their own bodies. If you have not, but you're going to when it's been released longer, good for you. I'm 100% all for people doing their own research and still committing to something that makes them and their families feel safer.

In order to work in hospitals, you are required to have a TB (tuberculosis) or Heaf skin test. This is for the safety of the patients with whom you come in contact. They inject a small amount of tuberculin under the skin to determine if the patient reacts. If they do, then they perform a chest x-ray to determine if there is presence of active TB. If there is not, then you are never to have the Heaf test again, as it can potentially reactivate latent TB in your body, and you are to have an annual chest x-ray for followup. Nobody balks against that because it's widely known and accepted. I, however, cannot take the Heaf test because I'm strongly reactive as notated by the Arkansas Health Department. My grandmother's TB had reactivated before her death and I was exposed to her routinely prior to her death. My mother was born positive because my grandmother had TB while she was pregnant with her. {She was also strongly encouraged in 1949 to abort her pregnancy, and assured that the TB would certainly kill her and her baby if she didn't. Thank God my grandmother was pro-Life.}
In order to work in sanitation or anything to do with water or sewage services, one must be vaccinated against hepatitis. It's not of concern because the risk of side effects from the hepatitis vaccine (although relatively new) are low to none. However, when Jerry received the injection into his shoulder, the reagent inflamed the underlying tissue and resulted in revelation of a torn rotator cuff. No, the vaccine itself did not cause the torn rotator cuff, but it is an example of things that can happen due to, but not directly related to, vaccines.
Because the natural creation of mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid) involves splicing that removes introns, the synthetic DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) created from mRNA also contains only the exon sequences. This synthetic DNA created in the laboratory from mRNA is known as complementary DNA (cDNA). Changes in the genetic sequence are called mutations. Mutations can be as small as the alteration of a single nucleotide—a change affecting only one letter in the genetic code. Such small-scale changes can produce an entirely different amino acid or can end protein production altogether. Large changes, involving the deletion, rearrangement, or duplication of hundreds or even millions of nucleotides, can result in the elimination, misplacement, or duplication of entire genes. Some mutations are harmless, but others can cause disease or increase the risk of disease.

Taken from the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Myriad Genetics attempt at patenting DNA/cDNA for the purposes of monopolizing access to BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene testing for breast cancer in 2013, this language was suggestive but not specific. If mutated gene sequences are as unpredictable as suggested in the syllabus, resulting in elimination, misplacement or duplication of entire genes, then the Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech vaccines that use mRNA wrapped in lipid nanoparticles to introduce mRNA coding for a the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in order to induce a person's own cells to make that protein and thereby stimulate the immune system to react against it, does essentially introduce a mutated strand of nucleic acid to the human body, thus promoting the aforementioned possibilities. If the whole of the human body is genetically altered due to the introduction of a laboratory mutated strand of DNA/mRNA or DNA/cDNA, without the full knowledge of the recipient, then can that human, as a whole, be owned? Is it worth being a laboratory experiment and potentially property of the federal government?

(Natural News) Researchers from Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) are warning that the messenger RNA (mRNA) technology used in Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” has the capability to forever alter recipients’ genomic DNA, making them more susceptible to disease and death.
Sometimes I blog about bullshit and sometimes I blog about situations that really need more expertise than I possess to thoroughly discuss. No, I am not a fearmonger. My husband received the mRNA vaccine with my blessing. His employer offered it, but did not mandate it. Now, it's being suggested that the whole of a human's genetic makeup can be altered by the injection of a tiny bit of this mRNA vaccine? Disturbing.
Yes, your employer can mandate a vaccine as a condition of hiring, employment or continued employment. They can because we are an at-will employment state. If they choose to fire you because you refused the vaccine, then there is a narrow window of possibility where you can fight the decision with the unemployment office, but that window will be closed the instant the FDA approves the vaccine for common use. Right now the FDA has approved HUMAN TRIALS, and you are part of the control group if you have not received the vaccine. All of us are part of the experiment. If you think the government doesn't already "own" you on some level, reach in your pocket and pull out your ownership number and look at those 9 digits that dictate your life. Since the social security number was first issued, you were pegged by location, year of birth, and your ownership number followed you all over the country. It is required to buy and sell, if you want credit or a job, and it is required for identification purposes (though the card expressly forbade use for identification purposes until recently). That card is then broken down to a state ID or driver's license; another particularly offensive approach at ownership. One cannot drive without a license to do so, but one can own a vehicle without a driver's license. That license is required as identification for travel, and you must present that along with the birth certificate (also bearing a specific number which identifies you from birth), in order to get a passport to leave the United States (or to get back in).

You think this vaccine is what the government uses to track you? No, silly, this vaccine is what the government is using to see if you'll comply. Those of us who won't are the ones they will soon target because they simply cannot have taxpayers who refuse to merge with the herd.
Kommentare